logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.09.17 2013고단378
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person engaged in driving of a vehicle XG in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unauthorized Measures after Accidents), the Road Traffic Act (Unlicensed Driving), and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Road Traffic Act").

On February 10, 2013, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license on February 10, 2014:41, proceeded one-lane of the four-lanes in front of the Central Self-Governing Hospital, from the area of the Central Self-Governing Hospital to the area of the upper south Scenic at about 70km.

At the time of night, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and operating the steering gear and reducing speed.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the vehicle due to the negligence of driving at the same speed, resulting in the decline of the vehicle on the right side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, and thus parked on the four-lanes of the said road, and the left side part and the panion part of the DNA Maz car owned by the victim E, and the left side part of the FMaz car owned by the victim E was received in the order of the left-hand part of the H Ⅱ truck owned by the victim G.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence as above, immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures, even though 29,801,432 won of the repair cost for the car owned by the Victim C, 3,289,579 won of the repair cost for the car owned by the Victim E, and 1,229,800 won of the repair cost for the car owned by the Victim G, even though the Defendant damaged the car owned by the Victim G to their respective parts.

2. The Defendant violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of Brane XG car without mandatory insurance.

The Defendant operated the car at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G statements;

1. Actual condition survey report, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, and report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Inspection of the insurance inquiry of vehicles damaged by accidents, and the ledger of vehicles locks;

arrow