logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고정128
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 5, 2015.

[2016 High 121] On May 8, 2014, the Defendant reported the victim’s phrase “to purchase floud smart fings” on the Internet’s website, and made a false statement to the victim that “to send 110,000 won to smart flouds upon remitting 110,000 won,” but there was no intention or ability to send the said goods even if the Defendant did not receive the price for the absence of the said goods.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 110,00 from the victim to the account in his/her name on the same day from the victim, and acquired it by money through the above six times from the date to June 3, 2014, as shown in the attached Table 1, as well as from June 3, 2014.

[2016 High 128] On December 31, 2013, the Defendant posted a letter stating that the victim C purchases the dice dice dice on the smartphone dump, and reported it to the victim and sold the said dice dump to 40,000 won.

A false statement was made.

However, there was no intention or ability to sell the goods such as keyboard.

Defendant: (a) received 40,000 won from the victim by deceiving the victim on the same day from the victim; (b) from that time until August 6, 2014, the victim received 30,197,476 won in total through 30 times, such as the attached Table 2 of the List of Crimes, from the time to August 6, 2014, from the victim; and (c) received 3,197,476 won in total, from the victim on the same day.

Provided, That the victim H of No. 2 and No. 16 of the crime sight table 16 is a clerical error in "I".

[2016 High 176] On May 26, 2014, the Defendant confirmed that “the Defendant shall purchase KRW 180,000,00, not only 3DS,” which had access to the Internet NAV and posted by the victim E,” and that “the Defendant’s contact to the Kakao Stockholm account F is different.”

arrow