1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded in the trial room, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

. It is difficult to take this entirely, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion.

Rather, the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire pleadings, are acknowledged based on the following circumstances, i.e., the timing of termination of the instant lease agreement, which is the premise for the instant lease agreement, and the Plaintiff was unable to submit a delivery certificate verifying the fact of the lease regarding the said additional rent. It is only acceptable to accept the Plaintiff’s assertion.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

A person shall be appointed.

B. It is recognized as 10,579,800 won (=22,900 won x 462), or as 10,509,000 won (=10,305,000 won, 204,000 won, 204,000 won) in the case of calculation based on the value per unit of the loss of 318,462, 780, 318 (60* 22,900), or as requested by the Plaintiff, in the case of calculation based on the value per unit of the loss of 10,509,00 won (= 10,305,000 won, 204,000 won, and 11).

The plaintiff pursuant to the above-mentioned recognition of 136,00 water pumps (450*1200) of 10 water pumps (450*1200) and 16,000 water pumps (450*1200) and 370 water pumps (400*1200), 363, 15,000 water pumps (300* 105,000 water pumps) and 340 water pumps (300*120) of 340 water pumps (100) and 644440 water pumps (1000), 2424 and 224 of the above-mentioned recognition (100 water pumps).

(See Evidence 11 and purport of claim) . 30 of 30 poppy (2.4M) 100 100 Gabs (1.2M) 32,000 Gabs (V6) 150 Gabs (V4) 150 Gabs (V4) 150 Gabs (V2) 150 150 Gabs (6M) 150 150 150 630 68 232,00 3,712,00 91,00 91,000 Gabs (4M) 91,000 Gabs (1,000 9,000 Gabs) 1,00 9,000 Gabs (50 Gabs (6M), 150 20 Gabs (50 280 Gabs) 16084,60