logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.12.19 2013고단1361
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 21, 2013, at around 12:40, the Defendant driven a DNA car without a driver’s license, and led the Defendant to proceed from the e-mail to the e-mail office at the e-mail of the e-mail of the e-mail of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-ray of the e-mail. The location was an intersection where a signal, etc. was installed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the survey report on actual conditions, accident site photographs, the ledger of driver's license for motor vehicles, and death certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines for negligence in the course of a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the maximum amount of the above two crimes shall be added to the punishment determined for the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents with heavy punishment);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order caused the instant traffic accident while the Defendant was in violation of the signal and caused the occurrence of the occurrence of the instant accident. However, the Defendant was the first offender who has no criminal history, and the Defendant was aware of all the facts of the crime, and agreed with the victim’s bereaved family members and the victim’s bereaved family members.

arrow