Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle with C low Pest another car.

On March 2, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 11:05, and proceeded along the five-lanes at the intersection of the 184 Daepo-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, along the two-lanes in the direction of the one-day tunnel in the direction of the school.

Since there is an intersection where a signal is installed, there was a duty of care for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to live well on the right and the right, and to drive the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the Defendant was driving a part of the victim H(28) driving car, which was waiting in the front direction of the opening direction in the direction of the police station, along with the cross-section in the upper right part of the passenger vehicle above the Defendant’s driving, and the part of the victim F(61) driving G driving car, which continued to set the crosswalk in the front direction back from the left side of the Defendant’s driving direction to the right side of the front side of the passenger vehicle above the Defendant’s driving vehicle, was driving in front of the upper right side of the victim F(61) driving G driving which was moving the crosswalk in the front direction to the right side of the vehicle above the Defendant’s driving, and the front part of the above part of the victim H(79 years old) driving car, which was waiting in the front part of the I SP vehicle and the two-lane vehicle at the right side of the signal, respectively.

The defendant, due to the above collision, had the part of the back part of the passenger H(28) driving driven by the above victim H(28) driving, and had the front part of the MM MM ob, which was in the front of the signal signal in the rear.

The Defendant continued to get the victim N(46 tax) driver who was in the atmosphere of the signal signal at the rear part of the left-hand part of J (79 Dozers) driver's vehicle, to get the front part of the left-hand part of the driver's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant above.