1. From KRW 1,700,000 to KRW 1,700, the Defendant’s month from December 25, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the buildings listed in the attached Table 1.

The facts without dispute, and comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the following facts: (i) on April 24, 2015, the plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on April 24, 2015 (attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 1; hereinafter the same shall apply to the building Nos. 101, 37.54 square meters, 102, 47.49 square meters, 119, 26.07 square meters; hereinafter the same shall apply) on the following grounds: (a) on the following grounds: (b) on the following grounds: (c) on the following grounds: (a) on the lease period of KRW 2,00,000 per annum from April 24, 2015 to April 23, 2017, the defendant may have agreed to terminate the lease agreement with the defendant at least 2616, respectively.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was terminated on August 4, 2016 due to the Defendant’s delinquency in rent, it shall be deemed that the contract of this case was terminated on or before December 24, 2016, there is a duty to deliver the above building to the Plaintiff at the same time with the remainder of money calculated by deducting the amount calculated by the rate of KRW 1,700,000 (deposit KRW 20 million - 18,300,000 from December 25, 2016 to December 25, 2016 to the completion date of delivery of the building of this case.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.