logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.31 2018고단1244
건조물침입등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 3, 2017, the Defendant, from around 04:13 to around 04:17 on April 3, 2017, screened the screen image of the parts of the arms of the non-victim who had danced by using the cell phone camera, in the mutual unsound club located in the world and below the Seo-gu Daejeon, and by using the cell phone camera from around 04:17.

2. On April 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:31, on April 18, 2017, carried out a video film recording of the parts of the non-victim’s bridge, which was the name of the victim, who was singing by using a mobile phone camera, at the mutual influence 06:31, the Defendant carried out a short set of strings with a short set of strings using the mobile phone camera.

3. On June 27, 2017, the Defendant, at around 16:04 around June 27, 2017, screened the parts of the victim’s bridge, which suffered a short flamer by using a mobile phone camera, in the three-type B shop around 16:04.

4. On July 12, 2017, the Defendant, on July 12, 2017, screened the parts of the victim’s bridge, which suffered a short flamer by using a mobile phone camera, on the front of the D Chinese restaurant located in Sejong around July 15:52, 2017.

5. Crimes committed on October 30, 2017;

A. A. On October 30, 2017, the Defendant invadedd a structure by entering the toilet installed in a female toilet in the E commercial building, via a toilet entrance, which was not corrected for the purpose of photographing the body parts of the women who seeing the day. B. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (use photographing, such as a camera, etc.) was committed by the Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 5-A, and at the same time, at the victim F (nive,), the Defendant operated the screen function of the mobile phone camera in front of the screen screen in which the victim F (nive, pseudonym), and then the part of the camera was flueed down to the lower end, and the victim was boomed into the upper part of the blamer, and then the victim was melted into the front part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. 112 Reported case lists, field photographs;

arrow