logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.13 2016나21275
추심금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the defendant's assertion added or supplemented in the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Determination on the additional or supplementary argument

A. First, the Defendant asserted that, inasmuch as Emhemtex Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Emtex”) filed a lawsuit claiming the instant loan claim against the Defendant in subrogation of B, and the judgment was rendered in favor of the Defendant, and L and I received the order of seizure and assignment of the claim against the instant loan claim, the instant lawsuit should be dismissed in its entirety.

In full view of the purport of the arguments and arguments in Eul evidence 8-1 through 3, Eul evidence 15-1 and 15-2, Eulmtex received 20% interest per annum from defendant 20% from May 1, 2015 to March 13, 2017, and 20% interest per annum from 20% interest per annum from defendant 261 to 20% interest per annum from defendant 20% interest per annum from defendant 216.3, from among loan claims in this case, Eulmtex received 351,092,160 won per annum 20% interest per annum from defendant 26.2, from March 14, 2017 to the date of complete payment, Eulmtex received 20% interest per annum 20% interest per annum from defendant 2616.2, from among loan claims in this case, it was determined that defendant 20% interest per annum 16.2, 2017 to the date of full payment.

seizure and seizure of claims;

arrow