The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no criminal conviction or heavier than a fine, and there is a favorable circumstance for the defendant such as the defendant's reflectiveness.

However, the crime of this case was committed four times by the defendant, who stolen another person's property, and attempted to steals another person's property, and assault and interfere with police officers' performance of official duties at the same time for the purpose of evading arrest. The defendant stolen other property which is the object of women or women's driving, and assaults police officers in the course of escape due to detection of the crime, and assaulting police officers during the course of escape, and did not agree with the victims, and the remaining victims excluding the victim J are punished against the defendant, it cannot be said that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, in full view of the following factors: the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.