logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.10 2011가합17536
부당이득금반환등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant d S.C. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Execution Company”) as the parties to the dispute newly constructed and sold an apartment B apartment on the land of 10 and 500 units on the surface of 62 units, both of which are 10 and 500 units (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Plaintiffs are the buyers who concluded a sales contract with the Defendant’s exercise and the instant apartment, or who acquired the sales right from the buyer.

(hereinafter “instant sales contract”). B.

On March 22, 2002, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do changed the infrastructure cost-bearing plan and the administrative litigation regarding the apartment of this case into a quasi-urban area and designated it as a quasi-urban area, and on March 22, 2002, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do publicly announced the alteration of the national land utilization plan and the approval of the village district development plan with the content of reducing the ratio of the residential site, while expanding infrastructure in consideration of criticism of the poor development, etc.

(D) (2) The following: (a) the Plaintiff, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the “instant business entity”), including the Defendant’s event, filed an application for the approval of the housing construction project plan covering the above C Won as the project site with the Gamb City Mayor including the Defendant’s event, constitutes a new city development committee; (b) the instant business entity constituted a new city development committee; and (c) on December 29, 2003, “the instant business entity shall install the urban infrastructure in accordance with the E Area development plan and contribute it to the Defendant’s acceptance; and (d) pay the installation charges of infrastructure calculated by the area ratio of the site for the application for the approval of the project; and (e) settle the amount of increase or decrease of the contribution in the amount of contribution as a result of the modification of the development plan in the process of the project implementation according to the modified contents.”

arrow