logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.28 2014구합60635
취득세등부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do (1) on March 22, 2002, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do changed the number of 920,141 square meters of a water zone into an agricultural and forest area and quasi-agricultural and forest area, which was announced by the Gyeonggi-do on March 22, 2002, to a quasi-urban area, and designates infrastructure as a village district, taking into account criticism of poor development, etc., on the other hand, on the one hand, he/she publicly announced the alteration of the land utilization plan and the approval of the village district development plan to reduce the ratio of residential site; on the other hand, on January 2, 2003, he/she announced the alteration of the urban planning plan as to the above land as to the third-class residential area (urban area) under the Urban Management Planning Act; (1) The Governor of the Gyeonggi-do shall install infrastructure in accordance with the project plan and the development plan for the urban welfare zone (including the public land subject to 200,000) to smoothly construct urban infrastructure and publicly notified under the Act.

Provided, That the Committee shall be limited to the extent permitted by the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.

arrow