logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2019.05.23 2018나56223
지분소유권이전등기말소등
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. Subjective and preliminary co-litigation is a form of litigation in which all co-litigants settle the dispute between themselves in the same legal relationship in a lump sum without contradiction (Article 70(2) of the Civil Procedure Act). A judgment shall not be granted in respect of the claims against all co-litigants (Article 70(2) of the Civil Procedure Act), or in respect of some co-litigants, or in respect of remaining co-litigants.

In addition, since the other party's litigation against one of the co-litigants in a subjective and preliminary co-litigants has an effect on all the co-litigants, if an appeal is filed against any of the main co-litigants and any of the preliminary co-litigants, the part of the claim against the other co-litigants is also transferred to the appellate court, which is subject to the appellate court's judgment. In such a case, the subject of the appellate court's judgment should be determined in consideration of the necessity of the conclusion that the main and preliminary co-litigants and

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Du17765, Mar. 27, 2008; Supreme Court Decision 2017Da207451, Jul. 11, 2017). The Plaintiffs primarily sought against Defendant M&A for the cancellation and restitution of the sales contract for each real estate listed in the separate sheet on the ground of a fraudulent act, and, in the event that the said claim is rejected, the Plaintiffs sought reimbursement against Defendant N&A for damages due to tort or nonperformance of obligation or restitution of unjust enrichment.

The first instance court dismissed the claim against the primary defendant M Co., Ltd., and accepted all or part of the claim against the primary defendant N, and only the plaintiffs appealed against the primary defendant M Co., Ltd.

The claim of this case against the Defendants is in a relationship that is neither acceptable nor acceptable to both claims.

arrow