1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiff's claim extended by this court, shall be modified as follows:

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 424.2 pages 3 of the first instance judgment shall be written with "424.88-2" written or added in two pages 3 of the first instance judgment.

From 5 pages 5 to 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following shall apply to 5 pages 5 to 5 pages 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance:

From July 26, 2016 to September 1, 2019, G hospital, etc. paid KRW 157,96,570 out of D’s charges, excluding KRW 27,548,610, 184,570 of D’s medical care benefit costs under Article 44 of the National Health Insurance Act, excluding KRW 27,548,610, and 157,570 of D’s charges, which occurred from medical care institutions, such as G hospital, etc. via health insurance, pursuant to Article 47 of the National Health Insurance Act (Claims for and Payment of Medical Care Benefit Costs) until September 26, 2019, until September 26, 2019 / [Grounds for recognition] Articles 47, 14, and 15 of the National Health Insurance Act

The 5th 19th 19th 3th 19th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 200.

The 6th to 8th of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:

A person shall be appointed.

B. However, there are various circumstances that can be seen by comprehensively considering the evidence mentioned above as well as Eul's negligence set-off and Eul's evidence as well as Eul's evidence or video as evidence Nos. 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 30, 31 (including paper numbers). In other words, on the bicycle surface of this case immediately before the accident of this case, there is a letter sign stating "astronomical" on the bicycle surface of this case prior to the accident of this case. The plaintiff's bicycle was installed with soil-Clip, or without the movement of defensive and anti-private losses discovered after the accident of this case.