A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 5. 1. 20:40경 삼척시 B 부근 길에서, 피고인의 부부싸움으로 112신고를 받고 출동한 삼척경찰서 C파출소 소속 경사인 피해자 D(40세)이 도로에 뛰어드는 피고인을 말리자, 주먹으로 위 D의 왼쪽 턱 부위를 1회 때려 피해자에게 약 2주간의 치료가 필요한 턱의 표재성 손상 등을 가하고, 같은 파출소 소속 순경 E이 현행범인으로 피고인을 체포하여 순찰차에 태우려고 하자 발로 위 E의 정강이 부위를 2회 걷어찼다.

As above, the Defendant interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the F, D, and E;

1. 112. List of reported cases;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Photographss related to each case, CCTVs, and black images of each case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. The point of obstruction of performance of official duties as stated in the relevant legal provisions on criminal facts: The point of injury as stipulated in Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrence and the choice of a punishment (the punishment provided for in the crimes of bodily injury which are the most severe in the judgment of each crime on the market and the punishment shall be punished, and the choice of imprisonment shall be

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., the crime records, etc. of this case