The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is the fact that the defendant enters the marina operated by the victim, but does not interfere with his/her duties.

Nevertheless, the court below convicted the defendant, which is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

(2) On December 23, 2013, the Defendant did not state specific reasons for appeal in the statement of reasons for appeal filed at the trial court. However, on December 23, 2013, the Defendant did not state specific reasons for appeal. However, on the basis of the statement at the trial court and the allegations made by the Defendant at the trial court, the lower court: (a) the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court; (b) the victim F did not sell alcohol to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant stated that “I would not sell alcohol; (d) I would like to say that “I would close the door of this case; (e) I would interfere with the business of the Defendant, such as taking one’s own arms,” and (e) the Defendant did not consistently state that “I would not have any defect outside of the trial,” and (e) the lower court did not have any way to prevent the Defendant from doing so.” (see, e.g., the record of evidence records).

Now, because the fighting has been fighting, the defendant and the victim were fighting.

As in this case, the defendant found in several times the E-art of this case and carried out a plaque.