The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 21, 2015, the summary of the facts charged by the Defendant: (a) around 10:40 on July 21, 2015, the Defendant entered the rest area of thischeon-si, the Defendant: (b) at the rest area of 609, 244-35, the Defendant was driving on behalf of the Defendant, on behalf of the Defendant, the Defendant Company C (the South, the age of 45) who was driving on the Highway in the city of Gyeongnam-si, having been driving on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant, and was not driving on behalf of the Defendant at the rest area of thischeon-si, stating that “I will go beyond one dial report on introduction of women.” (c) The Defendant was not driving on behalf of the Defendant at the rest area of thischeon-si, stating that “Icheon-si, I will be able to write off the chest, 3, 4, 3, 4, 7, and 8 chest.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records of this case, the victim can be found to have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 12, 2016, which is after the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.