logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.05.03 2017고단2934
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (obscenity distribution) at the Incheon District Court on April 30, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Chungcheong Prison on December 12, 2015.

On July 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) posted the victim’s photograph on the part of the victim’s Kakao Stockholm Stockholm account created for the purpose of slandering the victim; (b) posted the victim’s photograph on July 12, 201, on the part of the victim’s Kakao Stockholm account created by the victim for the purpose of slandering the victim; and (c) posted the victim’s photograph on the part of the victim’s Kakao Kakao Stockholm account in the victim’s name “in flight by narcotics and embezzlement” on the ground that the victim’s contact was cut down without returning the monthly rent of the officetels managed by the victim C for the Defendant; and (d) posted a false statement on the victim’s name, “The victim’s escape is now residing in this country,” and (e) posted a false statement on the part of the victim’s Kao E Kao Kao Kao Stockholm account from around July 15, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C Witness’s testimony;

1. Photographss of the Kakao Stockholm profo of a person to be exposed;

1. The message sent to F by the recipient;

1. Photographs of a Kakao scaro scaro propyo by a person to be affected;

1. Photographs by cutting down a Kakao scaro bulletin of the victim;

1. Search and seizure inspection warrant replys (the defendant and his defense counsel have any fact posted by the defendant or false knowledge of the defendant;

The argument is asserted.

The following circumstances that can be known in records, namely, the defendant assumes the victim.

arrow