1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff (B) was diagnosed on February 9, 2018, with the name of the retired mine on July 1, 2014, as the injury or disease of the Plaintiff (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the injury or disease of this case”) on the ground that “The Plaintiff (B) was diagnosed as the injury or disease of the field of the check infection, the right shoulder infection, the right shoulder infection, the right shoulder control, the right shoulder control, and the right shoulder control” ( collectively referred to as “the injury or disease of this case”).

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits by asserting that the Plaintiff sustained the injury or disease of this case by repeatedly performing the work that imposes a burden on the shoulder while serving as a mining source for about 27 years.

C. On July 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) did not verify the Plaintiff’s “this case’s injury to the shoulder shouldered part of the check, the right shouldered part of the shouldered part of the check, the right shouldered part of the disease; (b)” and “the Defendant’s injury to the right shouldered part of the disease in this case’s injury to the Defendant,” and “the Defendant’s injury to the right shouldered part of the check, the right shouldered part of the disease in this case’s injury, the right shouldered part of the check, the right shouldered part of the check, the right shouldered part of the case’s injury, the right shouldered part of the case’s injury, and the right shouldered part of the case’s injury to the Defendant’s injury.” In addition, the Defendant’s natural progress change following the age increase is determined. In addition, for about twenty-seven (27) years following the contents of the work, the Defendant did not have any other ability to determine the proximate causal relation between the Defendant and the Defendant’s disease in this case’s injury.”

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for examination with the Defendant. However, on October 10, 2018, the Plaintiff rendered a final decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request for examination, and the Plaintiff on December 2018.