logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.18 2015고단1184
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property damage on the street in front of “D pharmacy” operated by the victim C, which is located in the Gansi-si flooded area B; (b) destroyed a standing signboard, which is equivalent to KRW 300,00,000, at the market price of the victim-owned, who was set up at the place, under the influence of alcohol, while being under the influence of alcohol, by cutting it over the enclosed floor, and then damaging it.

2. On February 27, 2015, the Defendant committed violence, such as: (a) in front of “F” located in Geman-si Ma on the street, which had been reported as 112 due to the act described in paragraph (1) of the said Article; (b) the police officers belonging to the Geman-gu Police Station in the Gangseo-gu Police Station, which sent to the scene questions the Defendant about the circumstances of the instant case; (c) the Defendant intending to take a bath to “sing and chewing,” and dump the trees of the horse H by force, and dumping them with a pipe.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Application of the laws and regulations of I and C

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the amount shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant is divided into his/her own crimes, the fact that he/she commits any contingent crime, the fact that he/she has smoothly agreed with the victim C, and the fact that he/she has no record of punishment for the same criminal record and imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment, but the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the degree of obstruction

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow