1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the plaintiff added or emphasized judgment

(main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). 2. Additional determination

A. As to the main claim, the Plaintiff alleged in this part of the appeal does not prohibit the resale of the right to be supplied with the land created as a housing zone before entering into a supply contract. The prohibition of resale of the above right goes beyond the interpretation of the above statutes. The Korea Land and Housing Corporation has continuously allowed the resale of the right to purchase and sell the housing site like this case, and the current process of change of ownership has been taken place. Ultimately, the Defendant’s selling of the right to purchase and sell the housing site to the Plaintiff before entering into a housing site supply contract with the Korea Land and Housing Corporation does not constitute resale prohibited by the Housing Site Development Promotion Act. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to implement the procedure of change of ownership pursuant to the instant housing purchase and sale contract. 3) The Defendant asserts that “The Plaintiff is obligated to implement the procedure of change of ownership under the instant housing site purchase and sale contract.” According to the reasoning of the first instance court’s inquiry results and the entire argument about the Incheon Land and Housing Corporation’s Seoul Land and Housing Corporation’s Seoul Land and Housing Corporation’s Incheon District Headquarters’s Incheon District Headquarters, which would allow the buyer’s first purchase and sale of the housing site after the transfer agreement.