The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal of this case is without any fact that the defendant has harmed the utility of the indication of the compulsory disposition of this case, such as cutting down the belt of the closed fire extinguishers that was seized or taking out the fire extinguishing agents that were contained in the closed fire extinguishers that was seized. As to the fraud, the party who requested the transportation of the closed fire extinguishers is M who is not the victim and the party who requested the transportation of the waste fire extinguisher is not the victim, and the transportation cost is only liable to pay M who is not the victim. Thus, it cannot be deemed that the defendant has the criminal intent of deceiving or deceiving the victim.

2. The court below rejected the above assertion in detail on the grounds that the defendant asserted the same as the grounds for appeal of this case in the court below, and under the title "the judgment of the defendant as to the defendant's assertion", the court below rejected the above argument. The court below's judgment is just and it is not erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.