The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) knew of the name of “D” as “G”, thereby receiving a payment order from “G” as “debtor,” and conducted compulsory execution against the debtor G’s corporeal movables based on the above payment order.

The Defendant determined that the decision to suspend the effectiveness of compulsory execution, etc. received under the name of “D,” other than “G,” is null and void, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intention to commit a crime as stated in the facts charged.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant applied for a payment order for G as the debtor on February 12, 2009 by Busan District Court Branch Decision 2009Da6669, and around that time, the above payment order became final and conclusive (hereinafter "the above payment order of this case"), and ② the defendant applied for a correction order for the correction of the debtor's indication of the payment order of this case from "G" to "D" as of June 18, 2009 under the Incheon District Court Branch Branch Branch Decision 2009Kagi592, the defendant applied for the correction order of this case as of February 18, 2009 (the defendant asserted that the above correction application of this case was filed by another person, but there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion, ③ the defendant applied for a provisional execution order of this case as of August 5, 2009 to the District Court Decision 2009Da1568, which stated the above provisional execution order of this case as "D's seizure order of this case's 20.