beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. In order to have C (Death February 24, 201) a mother, a her mother, transferred real estate owned by her mother in the form of donation, among ductites, in a ductite.
(a) On January 26, 201, at the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju Mine-gu D apartment 306 dong 1403, Gwangju Metropolitan City, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the said C’s real estate donated, by using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to receive the gift of the said C’s real estate: The title “real estate donation contract”, “real estate indication”: the title E, land title: the title E in the Jeon Chang-gun, the Jeon Chang-gun, the Jeonbuk-gun; F
G. After preparing and printing the documents of the former, H, C, donee C, I, observer J, and then affixing the seal of the said J, which was held in advance subsequent to the name of the said J. Accordingly, the Defendant forged one copy of the letter of onerous gift contract, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the said J’s name. B. On January 26, 201, the Defendant, without authority for exercising the said C’s right to receive a gift of the said real estate at the said place, using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising the right to receive a gift of the said C’s real estate, the title “real estate donation contract”, the indication “land location” of the said real estate,
K. Sheet;
L. Answer;
e.before;
N. Jeon,
O. Jeon,
P. Answer;
Q. The answer;
R. Having prepared and printed the documents of the donor C, donee C, donee A, donee S, and observer J, and then affixed the seals of the above S and J, which were held in advance following the name of the donee S and the observer J respectively.
Accordingly, the Defendant forged a letter of gift contract, which is a private document on the rights and obligations under the name of the above S and J.
2. On February 7, 2011, the Defendant: (a) submitted two copies of the forged donation contract to the person who was unaware of the name of the employee of the pertinent registry office through the employees in the name of the affiliated certified judicial scrivener office; and (b) held each of them at the former Jeju District Court’s office at the Net Chang-si Office at the Net Chang Chang-si Office at the same time.
3. The defendants are the same as the defendants who have entered the original of a notarial deed in a false manner and exercised the original of a notarial deed.