beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant of "2017 Highest 5102" has been engaged in camping business as the representative director of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Business Co., Ltd. D.
1. On May 2015, the Defendant, at the infinite coffee shop located in Seoul on May 2015, 2015, is promoting the business of the Victim F to develop “H” to G in the Won-si, Gangwon-do. The Defendant’s use of the character “I” to create a carbin on the land of the Won-si and the Oke ballast and make profits from the winter.
Any profit-making profit-making may be made from a historical scrap metal.
In the event that the basic unit of the Gu is the price of 40 million won and 1 Kara group, and no later return of the investment money is made, there is no risk that the investment money will be made because it will bring about the ownership of the Kara group in the J Camping Chapter.
And the return on investment will take 12%.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the above theme park project was not secured with business guidance, and the defendant was planning to use funds from the beginning to pay personal debts by receiving money from the damaged party.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received money from the victim in total three times, including KRW 40 million, June 8, 2015, KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million on July 20, 2015, and KRW 30 million on July 22, 2015, and KRW 90 million on July 22, 2015.
2. On July 2016, the Defendant would be able to invest the victim’s phone in other Carcas projects by making too many people invest in H projects so that the Defendant may invest in other Carcas projects.
J Operation of the Oral Camping Chapter, and investment in this context must be done as soon as possible at present.
“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”
However, in fact, the defendant was planned to receive investment funds from the ice to use them for personal repayment, etc., and he was remitted from the victim.