logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.07 2014고단3572
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On June 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for violating the Labor Standards Act at the Seoul Central District Court on June 26, 2015, and the judgment is the same year.

7.4. Finality was established.

[2] The Defendant, from October 2010 to October 2010, 201, is a person who operates Da, a company engaged in camping, a company engaged in the production of camping.

The Defendant had been running since April 2012 due to the financial difficulties of E Co., Ltd. E, the Defendant had been unable to timely pay monthly to its employees from around April 2012. Around the end of 2012 amounting to KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000 to KRW 1,077,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, and it was difficult for the Defendant to secure funds through additional loans and loans. The Defendant concluded an exclusive sales contract with Kaba-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa-Sa

1. On November 9, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the H office of the Victim G management corporation located in Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si; (b) at the H office of the Plaintiff G management corporation located in Gwangju-si; and (c) to the HI president of the H; and (d) to allow our company to sell the car group with exclusive sales when producing the car group.

First of all, it is required to enter into a contract when paying KRW 20 million and KRW 24 million as advance payment.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the Defendant received advance payment from the injured party and the carbin down payment from the injured party, the Defendant did not have any intent to enable the said H to sell the carbin in accordance with the terms of the contract, and there was no intention or ability to return the said advance payment when the contract is non-existent.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, was an enterprise bank account under the name of Co., Ltd. D on November 9, 2012, with KRW 200 million as advance payment.

arrow