1. The counterclaim Defendant is 10,335,200 won to the counterclaim and 20% per annum from June 24, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 16 and arguments, the Counterclaim Plaintiff took charge of toll collection at the 2nd cycle of Gwangju metropolitan City, and the Counterclaim Defendant was working as the vice head at D, etc. The Counterclaim Defendant sent to 2014 and No. 35836 of Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office as “the Counterclaim Defendant sent a written petition against the relevant dismissal at D Office of Gwangju Metropolitan City, Cheongju 2013, which read “the Counterclaim Defendant was demoted to 15 on suspicion of indecent act.” The 20th public prosecutor sent a written petition against the 20th public prosecutor’s office to 3th public prosecutor’s office, which read “the Counterclaim Defendant was demoted to 4th public prosecutor’s office,” which read “the 5th public prosecutor’s office’s 20th public prosecutor’s 5th public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public office’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public office’s public prosecutor’s public prosecutor’s public office’s public office’s public office’s public office’s public office’s public office’s public office’s 1814.

"The facts constituting the crime were found guilty, while the counterclaim defendant denied the first crime, and all people who were in the place of meeting at the time were present as witnesses, to make the trial.