1. The Defendant’s KRW 22,510,840 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from April 5, 2016 to January 9, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C is a D vehicle at around 11:40 on April 5, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

A) While driving a vehicle and driving a three-dimensional distance front of the latter part of the vehicle in the direction to turn to the left, the front part of the Plaintiff’s driving who is waiting for the signal was shocked with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) The Plaintiff suffered from the injury of each of the instant accidents, including the patrial neves, etc.

3) The defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract against the defendant vehicle, and has no dispute about the ground for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (each of the entries and arguments including virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff sustained injury due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is liable for compensating the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the instant accident as an insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle.

2. In addition to the statements stated below within the scope of liability for damages, in principle, the period for the convenience of the calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 2 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Ground of recognition] The absence of dispute, Gap's statements or images, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8 through 11, 14, 17, Eul's evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (including paper numbers), and the result of this court's physical appraisal commission and inquiry about G Hospital Head, the purport of this court's obvious facts, rule of experience, and whole pleadings

A. Determination 1 on the assertion of lost income 1) Personal AH2) The Plaintiff was employed as a field lecturer in the course of directly operating the dactical institute, etc. from around 2007 to the time of the instant accident. The type of employment issued by the Ministry of Employment and Labor.