1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 246,935,834; and (b) against Plaintiff B and C, KRW 2,00,000; and (c) against each said money, on November 17, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) E is the FOba (hereinafter “Defendant”) around 17:40 on November 17, 2017.

) A driving his/her vehicle, while driving his/her vehicle and driving his/her three-lanes of 500-1 (500-1), one-lanes of the three-lanes of the road in front of the Hacheon-si Police Center, in Incheon, from the north side, the Plaintiff A, who opened the crosswalk to the left side of the direction of the course, shocked the Plaintiff A into the front side of the left side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff A sustained an injury, such as the blood transfusion on the left-hand side.

3) Plaintiff B and C are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle (based on recognition). [In the absence of dispute, Plaintiff B and C are the insurer that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle (including each number, hereinafter the same shall

each description or image of the court, the result of the commission of physical examination to the president of G hospital of this court, the fact inquiry results, the purport of the entire pleadings.

B. According to the above facts, the defendant, the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case, since he sustained the injury by the plaintiff A due to the operation of the defendant vehicle.

2. The scope of the plaintiffs' damages liability is as follows.

In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 9, 11, 15, 16, Eul evidence Nos. 6, Eul evidence Nos. 6, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the G Hospital Head of this Court, the fact inquiry result, each fact inquiry, significant facts, rule of experience, and purport of whole pleadings

A. Personal information of Plaintiff A and one labor ability loss rate: Hant, female, and July 2, 69, and female life at the time of the accident.