beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant limited liability company C (hereinafter “Defendant company”) entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Plaintiffs regarding each real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Defendant company (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as follows. Defendant D and Defendant E, a licensed real estate agent, arranged the instant lease agreement between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant Company regarding the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3.
5,750,000 won, 4,250,000 won, 4,250,000 won, from April 1, 201 to March 31, 2019, from February 17, 2017 to March 31, 2019, as specified in the attached list of the leased object on the contractual date; and 5,750,000 won, which was no longer from October 1 to September 30, 2020, 200
B. The real estate of this case is written in the entire certificate of registered matters as the first-class neighborhood living facilities, and the real estate listed in the table 1 and 2 in the building ledger is classified as each financial business establishment, and the real estate listed in the table 3 in the attached table 3 is classified as general restaurants.
C. On April 1, 2017, the Plaintiffs completed the business registration with the trade name of the instant real estate as “F”, “service business”, and “place of work”, and thereafter, operated the KHA and KHD.
On November 15, 2018, the Defendant Company terminated the instant lease agreement on the grounds that the Plaintiffs did not pay rent and management fee, and filed a lawsuit seeking the delivery of the instant real estate, unpaid rent and management fee (such as the name of the building, etc.). On January 9, 2019, the Defendant Company rendered a decision to recommend settlement (hereinafter “decision to recommend settlement of this case”) on the instant case, and the Plaintiffs and the Defendant Company did not raise any objection.
E. The main contents of the instant ruling of recommending reconciliation are as follows.
Decisions
1. The Plaintiffs jointly share the Defendant Company’s KRW 60,000,000 by January 31, 2019, and the said amount.