beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs,
A. The remaining Defendants except the Defendant AE and the Defendant succeeding Intervenor are brought against B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 13, 1991, AH and 30 persons (referring to persons including the transferor, if the acquisition of the right to real estate was held by the above people) purchased a factory building and a complex equipped with joint prevention theory (hereinafter “instant complex”) necessary for running a gold business on December 13, 1991. On December 30, 192, the Incheon Seo-gu Incheon land (hereinafter “instant aggregate building”) purchased an aggregate building (hereinafter “instant land”), AJdong, AKdong, ALdong, AM Dong (hereinafter “instant aggregate building”), and completed the registration of ownership preservation as co-owners by newly building AJdong, AKdong, ALdong, ALdong, AM Dong, and BM Dong, respectively, and completed the registration of ownership preservation as co-owners. On December 31, 1992, the instant aggregate building was divided into 40 objects of divided ownership and divided divided ownership (hereinafter “instant divided ownership”).
B. The plaintiffs, the defendants, and the defendant succeeding intervenor are parties to the partition contract of this case or persons or corporations succeeding to the sectional ownership of the instant condominium building from them, respectively, divided ownership of real estate indicated in the annexed Table 2.
[However, the real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 19 No. 2 list No. 19 is owned by the real estate owner who is not the plaintiff P, and the real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 27 No. 27 and No. 27 of the same No. 27 overlaps with the real estate stated in No. 8. The real estate is deemed to be a clerical error in No. 10 (Evidence No. 35), and (3) the term "share ratio" in No. 27 of the above presumption of clerical error was erroneous in itself, and as it appears that part of the part of the exclusive ownership of the instant complex was omitted at the time of the plaintiff's filing of the lawsuit, the real estate mentioned in the separate sheet No. 2 does not include AP No. 45 (Evidence No. 45) (hereinafter referred to as "Defendant E").
- the above list.