The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. It takes into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s erroneous determination on the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the Defendant’s wrong judgment; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine for a crime that causes a traffic accident in 2007; (c) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine again for a drunk driving in 2010; and (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for six months due to a three-year drinking driving in 2012; (c) the Defendant committed a crime without a license even though the said suspended sentence was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence due to a three-year drinking driving; (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine or a suspended sentence on a one-time basis; and (e) the Defendant was unable to assist the Defendant to give up the habit of traffic offense; (e) the sentence is inevitable; (e) the offense of violating the Road Traffic Act in this case constitutes a case where the Defendant was sentenced to a heavy punishment by driving after having committed a drunk driving twice or more times; (e) the statutory minimum period of imprisonment is one year before and after the Defendant’s imprisonment; (e.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.