logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고정1146
위증
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 10:00 on December 9, 2014, the Defendant appeared and testified as a witness of the case of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) from 18 to 2014 high-level 1754 Item B, etc. of the Jung-gu Government District Court No. 18 of 10:00, the Defendant did not witness the above questioning of the police officer, and the Defendant did not answer to the question, “I am at the seat of the party” and “I am at the seat of the party. I am at the seat of the police officer,” and asked the police officer “I am at the seat of the party” and “I am at the seat of this room, I am at the seat of the police officer to answer the question of whether I am at the seat of “I am at the seat of the party” and “I am at the seat of the public prosecutor.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocol of witness A examination;

1. Each investigation report (to ask whether or not a police officer, who is a police officer visiting the site, the statement and hearing of a police officer visiting the site, the contents of D police officer, the results of telephone conversations, E, C, and how or not a police officer, has opened the door), recording, and each recording [to show that the defendant has made a statement in his/her memory. In this case, the defendant's testimony, i.e., the contents of the defendant's testimony, that is, whether or not the person who has the right to reside in the room and the person who has the right to reside in the room, consented to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (the issue of joint residence, but the police officer or C did not have the same speech as the defendant's testimony on the date of the above residential intrusion, etc.). Nevertheless, the defendant merely and specifically exceeded the response to the leading question and question C of the police officer

arrow