The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant, by deceiving six victims, such as workplace rent and person who committed the crime of this case, shall take into account the following facts: (a) the crime of this case is of poor nature and the amount of deception, and the strict punishment of the defendant is inevitable; (b) some amount of damage was paid, and the victims did not agree with the victims, and the victims did not have agreed with the victims, and (c) the victims were faced with severe economic suffering, and (d) the guidelines for sentencing are comprehensively taken into account all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and the background and result of the crime, and referring to the sentencing guidelines. Although the defendant is in depth against the defendant and there is no criminal conviction for the same kind of crime, the defendant shall be considered.

Even if the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, it is not likely that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.