The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to be very poor in light of the method of crime, etc., since the defendant opened several defense rooms by entering the telecom in the middle of the court, colors the object of the crime, and steals the money of the victim by entering the room of the body of the body of the victim.

In addition, the Defendant was punished several times as punishment for the same and different types of crimes, and in particular, around 2009, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the period of repeated crimes, without being aware of the attempted rape, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three and a half years and six months for the same crime.

In this context, considering that the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances, and result of the crime in this case and the sentencing guidelines are considered, even though the defendant is in a profoundly against the defendant and the victim has agreed with the victim, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.