logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단3807
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the corporation D who entrusted the management of the commercial building from the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for the management of the commercial building.

The Defendant was duly terminated on August 30, 2014, and around January 15, 2015, the Seoul Northern District Court issued a provisional disposition to the effect that “The above Company shall not enter the second floor disaster prevention room under the ground of the building, and shall not interfere with the access or use of the above members.” On September 10, 2015, the employees E of the above Company, who managed the disaster prevention room of the building in the above case, was set back around September 10, 2015, and thereafter, the above commercial building management unit was independent of the management of the above building in the above C, but around October 23, 2015, the door door of the building in the second floor above C, which was opened from the entrance of the building in the above C, to prevent the disabled members from entering the entrance of the building in the above C, the building in the front floor, and the building in the middle floor.

“The above F, G, and H, who may know of the dispute on the side of the management division of the above company and the commercial building, was allowed from October 24, 2015 to October 24, 2015 to October 12:30, 2015, to have the victim I and the victim J, who is the chairman of the management division of the above commercial building, enter the disaster prevention room into the above disaster prevention room.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victims' work by having F, G, and H interfered with the victims' management of the above C building by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in relation to G, H and F;

1. Each written statement of J and I;

1. Copies of objection against provisional disposition 2015Kahap 20039;

1. A copy of the decision on the disposition of a gold bullion for business suspension and access interference (Submission of a victim);

1. Investigation report (report on telephone conversations by witnesses);

arrow