(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.11.25 2016가단210343

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.11.25 2016가단210343

위자료

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant established an inappropriate relationship with C while working in the non-party D corporation operated by the plaintiff's husband who is the plaintiff's husband, and born the non-party E, the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the amount stated in the claim as consolation money.

B. The judgment is based on the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff and C are legally married couple; (b) the Defendant, despite being aware of this fact, has sexual intercourse with C around 2008; and (c) the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that the Defendant gave birth to a child between the Defendant and C, has no dispute between the parties; or may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of pleadings as a whole in the statement in the evidence Nos. 1 through 6. Accordingly, the Defendant violated the Plaintiff’s community life by committing an unlawful act with C and his spouse, which is the Plaintiff’s legal spouse; and

2. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion

A. On July 9, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for damages, but withdrawn on October 26, 2010. The three-year statute of limitations expired from the date the Plaintiff became aware of the damage and the perpetrator.

B. In full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4, and 1 and 2 as a whole, the defendant sent to the plaintiff a certificate of content that the plaintiff was dismissed by exercising pressure on the part of the defendant and C on February 11, 2009. ② The plaintiff pointed out the inappropriate relationship between the defendant and C and the defendant around February 17, 2009. ③ The defendant sent the plaintiff a certificate of content that the plaintiff would withdraw criminal measures against the defendant. ③ The defendant did not claim civil and criminal liability as stated in the above content certification, instead of the plaintiff and C.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.02.06 2014가단29212

-부산지방법원동부지원 2017.05.25 2016가단215624

-의정부지방법원고양지원 2017.12.07 2016가단92099

-서울남부지방법원 2016.02.03 2015가단28375

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.03.25 2020가단5002062