logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단1859
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be the resident and victim D of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex C, and the management and operation chairperson of the apartment complex.

1. From June 25, 2014, around 19:30 on June 25, 2014, the injured Defendant: (a) informed the other resident of the vehicle parked by the Defendant in C Apartment Management Office that compensation for damages was delayed because other residents did not properly arbitration in the management office of the vehicle with the wall; and (b) informed the victim of the fact that compensation is delayed; (c) audit of the operation of the apartment; (d) the operating committee is well-filled; (c) the head of the management office of the victim D is shakingd; (d) the face part of the vehicle that the Defendant was parked by the victim once, and (d) the victim suffered injuries, such as kneeing for two weeks’s treatment, by walking the bridge part once.

2. The Defendant: (a) expressed to F of the defect that F of the police box affiliated with the Seoul Mapo Police Station Escopic Police Station Escopic F of the Seoul Mapo Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 that the assault case occurred at the same time and place as that of paragraph (1), arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing an injury identical to paragraph (1) and tried to board the patrol vehicle; and (b) provided a scopic therapy to F of the police station.

Accordingly, F prevented the Defendant, and re-influent the Defendant from carrying the F with the patrol vehicle, and the Defendant, by hand, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers at one time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant statutory provisions concerning criminal facts (the occupation of an injury and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act and the defendant are as follows.

arrow