logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고단1288
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 21:51 on March 21, 2016, the Defendant asked the status of the police officer belonging to the J District Police Station of the Gwangju Northern Police Station, the police officer of the J District, and the patrol officer of the J District Police Station of the Gwangju Northern Police Station who was sent to the Defendant after being reported to the Defendant’s spouse at around 112 at around 1:51, the Defendant

Cp. Doz.

Chewing flab flaz flab

“...” The Defendant’s boat refers to the above K’s hand as being pushed and stened by the Defendant, and the L’s above L’s “hey and Habbbs...”

”라고 말하며 손을 잡자, 왼손으로 L의 목 부분 울대를 잡아서 밀치고, 위 경찰관들이 피고인을 공무집행 방해 현행범으로 체포하여 순찰차에 탑승시키려고 하자, 오른발로 위 L의 오른팔을 1회 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning reporting duties and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which statements made by the police concerning L are entered;

1. Where the relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the reason for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment [the scope of recommending punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of sentence] where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) [a special mitigated person] [a decision of sentencing] (a decision of sentence] the course and method of the instant crime, the degree of the offence, the degree of the offense, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury at the Gwangju District Court on April 20, 2016 and currently is pending in the appellate court, and the crime of this case was committed together with the above judgment, considering the punishment that would have been received if the judgment had been rendered.

arrow