1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the plaintiff the 78.0 square meters of 100 square meters of Gyeongnam-gun's ground wood tank C and apappoly floor house.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff leased the instant land and buildings to the Defendant on May 18, 2014 by setting lease deposit money of KRW 3 million from May 18, 2014 to June 5, 2015, and thereafter, on June 25, 2016, the lease contract of this case was clearly concluded by the Defendant from June 6, 2016 to June 6, 2017, to June 15, 2016, and the lease contract of this case was terminated by designating the lease contract of this case as KRW 78.0 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”), and the lease contract of this case from June 6, 2016 to June 6, 2017 to June 15, 2016 to June 28, 2016.

I would like to say.

According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 7, the plaintiff sent a text message to the defendant on June 27, 2018, stating that "the director is appointed by July 13, 2018." On the same day, if the defendant fails to enter into a contract with the plaintiff on the same day, he/she shall be appointed to the director on July 13, 2018.

“The fact that the Plaintiff sent text messages can be recognized, and since the sales contract for the instant land and building was not concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, it may be deemed that the instant lease contract was terminated by agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiff.

2. The defendant's assertion is that the plaintiff did not notify the plaintiff of the rejection of renewal from six months to one month before the expiration of the lease term under the lease contract of this case.