All appeals filed by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence sentenced by the court below to the Defendants (Defendant A: imprisonment for 8 months, 2 years of probation, observation of protection, confiscation, additional collection, Defendant B: imprisonment for 6 months of probation, 2 years of probation, community service order, Defendant E: fine of 6 million won, Defendant G: fine of 6 million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor (Defendant A and B)’s each sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendants is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the grounds for appeal

A. The fact that Defendant A stated that the instant crime is recognized and against the Defendant, the period of direct operation of the instant place of business is shorter, the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, etc. for which the judgment has become final and conclusive, and the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, and the single concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and the fact that the same should be judged at the same time, and that the health is not good due to the use of a

The Defendant has had the history of having been punished twice by the act of arranging sexual traffic in the same kind, and has the history of having been punished as a violation of the Medical Service Act, a violation of the Immigration Control Act, and a violation of the Immigration Control Act in relation to marina business, and the Defendant, despite the control and criminal punishment as above, continues to engage in marina business and the business of arranging sexual traffic in the same place of business until the crime of this case was committed, is deemed to have no intention to awareness about sexual traffic business, improve the character and conduct, and there is considerable possibility that the same crime

In light of the above favorable circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, family relation, motive, means, consequence, etc., and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant arguments and records, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual intercourse, family relation, motive, means, and consequence after the crime, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or unreasonable.

B. Defendant B.