logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.09 2014가합502228
하자보수보증금 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part on Defendant B’s claim for KRW 306,985,819 as well as damages for delay.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Party 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s 8-dong A Apartment-dong 608 households and ancillary facilities (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a project proprietor who constructed and sold the instant apartment.

3) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”)

(B) The Defendant B entered into a contract with the Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (at the time, Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation was a stock company, but a mutual change) for the instant apartment as indicated below with respect to the instant apartment between the Defendant B and the Korea Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation (hereinafter “each of the instant guarantee contracts”).

A) The Defendant’s Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation concluded a warranty period of 1 D 1D 1D 209 from January 28, 2009 to January 27, 2010, 607,548,672 E 2 E from January 28, 2009 to January 27, 2011, FF 607,548,6723 from January 28, 201 to January 27, 2011, 209 to January 91, 201, 323,084 G 2084 G 209 to make an alteration of the construction inspection or to make an alteration to the construction inspection to the Plaintiff’s respective design and construction drawings.

2. From the time of the above pre-use inspection, the Plaintiff continuously requested the repair of defects at the request of the occupants and sectional owners of the apartment of this case. While Defendant C intended to perform the repair work for some defects, the apartment of this case contains any defects such as the defect repair specification by item 1. The apartment of this case remains.

arrow