logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.15 2014나38823
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (D Co., Ltd.) was an investment company for the establishment of a small and medium enterprise and its business purpose is to make investments in venture businesses, to organize a small and medium enterprise establishment investment association, and to perform its duties. (2) Defendant B was the Plaintiff’s representative director from February 15, 200 to April 5, 2012, and Defendant C was the Plaintiff’s auditor from August 10, 200 to April 5, 2012.

B. The Plaintiff’s establishment of a small and medium enterprise establishment investment association (hereinafter “each of the instant investment associations”) was organized by the Defendants as indicated in the following table while serving as the Plaintiff’s director and auditor, and became an executive member. E was the largest investor of each of the instant investment associations, and each of its special partners was the Plaintiff. E’s executive member is N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”).

On or around June 23, 2008, Defendant C subparagraph 7 of this case (No. 20 billion won) investment association around June 23, 2008, Defendant C subparagraph 8 of this case (No. 8 of this case) around 15 billion won around January 201, 201, Defendant C subparagraph 9 of this case (No. 4 J investment association of this case), Defendant C subparagraph 9 of this case (No. 1,23.4 billion won around November 8, 201, and Defendant B and K subparagraph 10 of this case (No. 10 of this case)

C. Of the bylaws of each of the instant investment associations, the parts related to the instant case are as indicated in the annexed Table 1.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff entered into a consultation or service contract (hereinafter “each contract of this case”) with a third party as described below while the Defendants were in office as representative director or auditor, and entered into a consultation or service contract (hereinafter “each contract of this case”).

L in relation to the advisory contract on September 1, 2010 (hereinafter “instant first contract”) L L L related to the investment association under subparagraph 8 of the instant contract title, L is providing consultation on the operation of the partnership, conducting overseas market research for investment in partnership projects, and finding support for partnership projects.

arrow