A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Seoul Northern District Court to a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and on June 7, 201, to a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

1. Around 05:40 on December 18, 2012, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately 500 meters alcohol level with approximately 0.114% alcohol level while under the influence of alcohol from the Do in front of the day-to-day in the same Gu, where it is difficult to find out the trade name located in the 3-dong in Mangsan-gu, Mangsan-si.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a passenger car at Benz.

Around 05:40 on December 18, 2012, the Defendant proceeded along the three-lane roads in front of the one-lane of the one-lane distance in Mangsan-gu, Mangsan-si, Mangsan-si with two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the one

At the time, since it is a private-distance intersection where signal lights are installed at night, there was a duty of care to safely drive the front door and the left and the right of the vehicle in preparation for the case where there is a vehicle waiting for signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, took the front part of the DM7 car driven by the Defendant, which was driven by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 25 years of age) who was under a stop for the air traffic signal by negligence, and had the said EM car take the front part of the DM7 car driven by the Defendant, and let the said EM vehicle take the front part of the FM7 car driven by the victim E (the 52 years of age) who was under a stop at the front bank, and again she again gets the part of the right part of the HM7 car driven by the victim (the 48 years of age) who was under a stop at the front bank.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence caused the injury to the victim C, such as catum salt, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, to the victim I (V, 54 years of age).