Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant damaged the market value of the victim’s ownership, such as: (a) he/she laid the glass cupped Cup on the bottom and breaking it up without any reason while working and drinking in the Fjuk point of the operation of the victim E in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
2. The Defendant suffered injury by hand at the time, place, etc., as set forth in paragraph 1, in order to prevent beer’s disease from spreading the beer’s floor, stage, etc., and caused injury to the victim, such as 4,5 o’s knife, knife, and knife’s knife on the left side of the victim E (the age of 55) and knife the knife and knife the knife for about two weeks.
3. The Defendant: (a) obstructed the operation of the instant restaurant by force by force on the part of the victim, such as: (b) throwing the glass cups on the table without any justifiable reason while working in a day and place as referred to in paragraph (1); and (c) shouldering the table by a arbitr and throwing the stage by a arbitr; and (d) throw the arbitr with a stage.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. The sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances as to the sentencing reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.
- The Defendant, who was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to the crime of aiding and abetting the offender, completed the enforcement of the sentence, and thereafter, is likely to be subject to criticism during the repeated crime period - the recognition and reflect of the crime, and the victim and the victim wish to be punished by the Defendant.