The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant used the victim’s arms and dancing in order to prevent the victim from leaving the victim in order to comply with the intent of the victim; and (b) the victim did not fast up with the victim; and (c) the victim was highly likely to have been exposed to protruding voltage of the lower part of the street lamps, and thus the Defendant abused the victim.

Although it cannot be seen, the lower court found the Defendant guilty on the sole basis of the victim’s statement, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim consistently maintained until the court of the court below rendered a judgment that the defendant satisdddds and satisds and satisds of the victim.

the victim's statement may be believed to have been made.

Defendant

It is also assumed that he/she has had the arms and hump of the victim.

As recognized, only that alone can be seen as an act of violence as a tangible power, and there was a cause that protruding V exceeded the victim.

Even if the defendant did not see the victim's blance, he would not go beyond the victim if he did not do so. Thus, the defendant's blurged the victim.

assessment may be conducted.

Therefore, the judgment below erred by misunderstanding the facts.

Since the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.