logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2016.02.05 2015고합51
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a doctor who operates a hospital in the S, and the victim I (n, 38 years of age) is a business owner who operates the “J” at the H of the Y incheon-si.

On December 10, 2015, the Defendant lodged an appeal after being sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended sentence for the crime of injury, etc. from the Cheongju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Support, and currently pending in the appellate trial. On October 1, 2015, the instant case was found at the above main points operated by the Defendant I, and thus, the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the said victim. However, as seen above, on December 10, 2015, the Defendant was subject to suspended sentence in the first instance court to be sentenced to suspended sentence.

1. On December 11, 2015, the Defendant found the main points of the above “J” around December 23:10, 2015, and sought from the victim I who was seated in a ward, and later “I were fluor of fluor and father,” and “I were fluor of fluor of fluort and father,”

I would like to express why I would soon be called D. C.C., h.) and why I would like to say, “I would like to make a false statement.”

Since it was suspended, it was suspended.

N. N. N. reported to the police, but the police police in the same year of width will be soon.

Dr. The police of the same scarbling-do shall be inside of the neutical system.

“Intimiding the threat, as it threatens the above victim, with hand and scam.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim I with the purpose of retaliation against his statement or testimony in connection with his criminal case trials.

2. On December 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was under the police restraint sent around 01:20 on December 12, 2015, and went to the “J” position of the victim I; and (b) was again found to the customer T who had drinking at that place; (c) whether the Defendant would drink drinking at the same place as that of the womb;

In this regard, there is no good to drink.

This note is the main point to cover the drinking value with the drinking value. The drinking value or e.g., the drinking value or e., the drinking value, and the bath, while taking a bath, putting the guest out of the room, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim I's main business by force.

3. The defendant interferes with the performance of official duties.

arrow