The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On December 29, 201, the Defendant, as the representative director of the corporation D, entered into a contract with the Korea International Cooperation Agency for the supply of “Tcheon Timber Co., Ltd.” products, and issued a test report of the Korea Forestry Promotion Agency, a testing institution, to undergo a quality inspection and an inspection report (certificate of inspection) from the Agency for Defense and Quality Assurance. However, as the test result of the “Tcheon Timber Co., Ltd. No. 170” product falls short of the standards for the standards for the disposal of anti-debris prescribed by the Ministry of National Defense, the Defendant modified the test report and submitted it to the Agency for Defense for Quality and Technology and submitted it to obtain the quality inspection

On March 1, 2012, the Defendant drafted and printed the official document “90,” “6.5,” “2.6,” and “9.1,” using a computer without authority, for the purpose of uttering at the office of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and copied the official document after attaching 9.1 on October 10, 201, the original copy of the forestry test report in the name of the president of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute for Products of “170, 170, 170, 90, on May 10, 201, 6.5, 6.5, 2.6, 0.6, on October 6, 201, and 9.1, on January 1, 201, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant altered the forestry test report under the name of the president of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute, which is an official document.

B. On March 2012, the Defendant submitted the altered official document test report as if it was actually issued the altered official document to an employee in charge of the quality inspection of the Agency for Defense Technology and Quality Assurance, who was traveling a business at the location described in paragraph (a) at the end of the lower end of the month, as described in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the forestry test report under the name of the president of the Korea Forestry Promotion Institute, which is an altered official document.

C. Although the test result of “170-type 170-type product on a tent timber farm owner” at the time and place indicated in the B, the Defendant had altered the product as described in the A, despite that it falls short of the standards for the disposal of wastes prescribed by the Ministry of National Defense.