A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant misrepresented the employees of the financial company by the direction of an employee of the telephone financial fraud (one-time warning) (one-time warning), and received cash from the victims and delivered them to their names in order to collect cash. The Defendant, according to the direction of the victim under his name and in accordance with the direction of the victim, was responsible for the role of receiving and delivering the money from the victims to the account that is directed by the general responsibility, thereby deceiving many unspecified victims, thereby soliciting them by deceiving them to acquire money from the victims.

On April 16, 2020, the person under whose name the person under whose name was not the victim was named AC or AD employee, and called the victim AE and called the "50 million won loan was approved in the Financial Supervisory Service," and "the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name was the victim was the victim was the victim of the contract," and "the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name was the victim of the loan was the victim of the existing loan." The person under whose name the person under whose name the person under whose name was the victim was the victim of the existing

However, in fact, the person who is not aware of the fact that he had the intention or ability to make the loan to the victim by deceiving the victim under the Bophishing method, but did not have the intention or ability to do so.

According to the above instructions, the Defendant received cash of KRW 14.5 million from the victim in front of the AF convenience store near the bus terminal located in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, and received KRW 14.5 million in cash from the victim and sent it to the account designated by the winners of his name, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the person who was not aware of his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of the police statement on the AE of the defendant's partial legal statement, the details of a report on damage to the police statement, the closure of CCTV, the screen to which the CCTV is to be cut

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;