beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Seized evidence No. 1 shall be returned to the victim B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The defrauded assumes the position of the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service in accordance with the direction of the organization of telephone financial fraud (one name, hereinafter referred to as “scaming”), and instead, as a “cash removal”, the Defendant conspireds to collect money from the victims by deceiving an unspecified number of victims by deceiving them by deceiving them of the fact that he/she takes charge of deposit without a passbook or delivering cash to the account directed by the victims upon receiving cash from the victims according to the direction of the total liability on his/her name, and by inducing them to receive money from the victims.
On September 4, 2018, at least 09:54, the total liability on the name omitted calls to the victim B, misrepresenting the prosecutor C of the Seoul Western District Prosecutors' Office, and searching for all the money deposited in the lower account due to deposit of KRW 1.40 million in the passbook under the name of the party in which the person was arrested, and having to investigate whether the money deposited in the lower account was involved in the crime, thereby making it false to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service in the Seoul Station, and continuously ordering the Defendant to receive the victim only by using the “E”, a smartphone-type display case.
On September 4, 2018, at around 16:54, the Defendant pretended to be an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service on the first floor of G Airport Railroad in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and acquired an envelope with an amount equivalent to KRW 24.8 million, which is the amount of damage from Bophishing, from the victim, under the pretext of acceptance of KRW 5,00,000,000, and continuously delivered the remainder of KRW 24.3 million to the above person under the name of the Defendant, on the same day.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the general responsibility of the name in general.
2. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of private documents;