1. Of the instant lawsuit, each of the dispositions against Plaintiffs A, B, and C and the disposition of suspension from office against Plaintiff D for two months.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an educational foundation operating a F University; Plaintiff A is a professor of Han-do University from March 1, 2002 to Korea University; Plaintiff B is a professor of the Social and Social Sciences University from March 1, 1994 to F University; Plaintiff C is a professor of the cultural contents department of the cultural contents department of the N University from March 1, 1994 to F University; Plaintiff C is a professor of the cultural contents department of the cultural contents department of the cultural contents department of the cultural contents department of the cultural contents department of the N University; and Plaintiff D is a professor of the F University’s Animal Resources Research Department.

B. On March 13, 2015, the Defendant demanded the F University Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to make a disciplinary resolution against the Plaintiffs on the grounds as follows; and on July 1, 2015, following the resolution of the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee, the Defendant issued a disposition of removal and suspension from office for two months against the Plaintiffs A, B, and C on July 9, 2015.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). Plaintiff A of the grounds for disciplinary action

1. The fact that it is improper to use the school expense budget, such as using it for purposes other than those of the school expense, at the time of employment of the student support director (from November 4, 2010 to September 1, 2013);

2. The fact that he/she interferes with school administration and schedule by participating in an in-school meeting to refuse to give character education on September 4, 2014 and September 15, 2014;

3. The fact that he/she interferes with business affairs without permission by entering the meeting place of the board of directors at around 11:00 on November 25, 2014;

4. The fact that he/she interferes with the affairs of disciplinary action by entering the meeting room of the teachers' disciplinary committee without permission on November 13, 2014;

5. The fact that he/she defames a school and instigates a student at a school meeting held by the majority (including August 18, 2014; October 6, 2014; October 22, 2015);

6. Plaintiff B: The fact that the Plaintiff interfered with the affairs of the Student Disciplinary Committee and instigates students on December 3, 2014 is identical to the grounds of disciplinary action 3 and 4 against Plaintiff A, and that the Plaintiff slandered the school at a meeting of a majority (on August 19, 2014, October 1, 2014, and January 22, 2015) and instigated students C

1. The fact that he/she poorly supervised and supervises the progress of the miscellaneous program at the time of his/her employment as the planning director (from November 4, 2010 to September 1, 2013);

2.Consultations with the Korea Foundation for the Promotion of Private School in connection with the new construction of a public dormitory at the time of his/her service.